Delete vs. Move

3 replies [Last post]
ernesto17
Offline
Joined: Dec 7 2004

A very simple question (I hope). When one uses “Delete” (or Shift-Delete) to delete a file, I understand that it is not really deleted, one only deletes its  “pointer” that tell the OS where the file is. The file itself is still in the hard disk, and that is why one sometimes can recover it with the appropriate software.
What happens if instead of deleting a file, one uses the MOVE command to move it to a different disk? Is the file in its original place still recoverable as when it is deleted?
Many thanks
Donald Richards (ernesto17)

harlequin
harlequin's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 16 2000
Re: Delete vs. Move

Delete = recycle bin , file renamed usually with a preceeding $ sign in place of first real character , and hidden

Shift-Delete =space available for another file , but still there till file space overwritten

MOVE = same outcome as Shift-Delete , the space is freed up , but file technically still there till overwritten.

SO , YES is answer to Is the file in its original place still recoverable as when it is deleted?

Gary MacKenzie

sepulce@hotmail.com ( an account only used for forum messages )

Thinkserver TS140 , 750ti Graphics card  & LG 27" uws led backlight , Edius 8

Humax Foxsat HD Pvr / Humax Fox T2 dvbt

Fergie
Offline
Joined: Jan 9 2001
Re: Delete vs. Move

Downloaded a program once to recover deleted photos on an SD card.
don't recall what the program was called, but it worked a treat.

Cheers.

               
                  Fergie
There's only one eF in Ferguson

I now seem to spend a lot of time arguing with inanimate objects

ernesto17
Offline
Joined: Dec 7 2004
Re: Delete vs. Move

Many thanks to harlequin and Fergie for their answers. Now I know! 

Regards

Donald (ernesto17)