
The rebuild after the Great Crash earlier in the year was done with the best of intentions, but the wrong software was chosen. The look of this forum is wrong and it is slow to respond. I've not found this stark, wasteful-of-space software in use elsewhere and it is obvious why - because it drives people away.
Previously, the most-used sections were all in view on the screen at the same time. After the rebuild they were jumbled up and many are out of sight and out of mind.
As one of the people who tried to get the software changed before it was too late, I incurred the wrath of those running things. A decline has followed a bad decision. Now it is difficult to avoid saying "I told you so".
Ray
People are very happy with change - if it's the right change. Think how fast DVDs took over from VHS.
The way that the world is now interconnected means that the results of change can be judged more quickly. It's harsh, and those that make the wrong decisions will feel hurt, but hurt feelings are just something you have to get over.
I'd like this forum to succeed. Is it really too late to make a change for the better?
Ray
I agree, so few of us left here now. But the few that remain never fail to five me wonderful advice when l need it.
Don't have a go at the VOLLENTEERS who have given up weeks of their time to make this site, pay for its hosting, and keep it online.
Tom,
Look again at the messages above yours. They are not getting at you.
The problem was created before you took a hand. The problem is that the wrong software was chosen and it runs with too much delay.
It is not a question of tinkering with what we have at present, the decline will just continue. It is the wrong software.
Ray
Tom, Look again at the messages above yours. They are not getting at you.
No they are getting at Bob, Martin, and the team of moderators who collectivly run this site. (i'm not taking this personally! But uninformed technical critisium of vollenteers upsets me, even if not aimed directly at myself)
The problem is that the wrong software was chosen and it runs with too much delay. It is not a question of tinkering with what we have at present, the decline will just continue. It is the wrong software. Ray
So where has everyone gone. I assume they are on different forums somewhere.Cheer
.........So where has everyone gone. I assume they are on different forums somewhere.Cheer
Moderators and owners of forums need to develop a thick skin, and not treat negative comment as an annoyance - some very odd responses to questions at that time really put some members backs up. Forums have a synergy that keeps them going, and sadly this one lost a great deal of it. It's very common for minor changes on a forum to be resisted by the membership, major changes as we had mean that for every one who likes it, there will be 10 who miss their favourite feature that the mods don't even know members use.
At the end of the day nobody is forced to come here, read or post to the forum. If you don't like it then you can choose to go elsewhere. If you want everything to be like it was in 1999 then good luck with that, if you find a way to get back to that point then i'll have a pint for £1 and i'll smoke while i drink it.
really i find this all quite distressing, this forum has been a real challenge for me, I still care and would like to help sort out the issues, but threads like this one simply make me want to walk away.

Martin,
Thanks for your comments.
In my first response on this thread I said "The look of this forum is wrong and it is slow to respond." and I stand by that.
I'm not a website designer. I'm a user of websites and that is the point. A website is there to be used and user's thoughts represent a healthy feedback - both positive and negative. User reviews of products and services are the norm now - eBay, tripadvisor, etc.
So let me ask these two questions.
Would other software improve the speed of updating these pages?
If there is other suitable software, what are the options?
Ray
The lad who had his motorbike in bits in the living room has gone
JOHN . A.V. wrote:
The lad who had his motorbike in bits in the living room has goneI'm still here, and it's in the conservatrory actually, and in the shed, the garage, and a bit in the dining room......
Fergie wrote:
So where has everyone gone. I assume they are on different forums somewhere.CheerMy appologies, I didn't realise that asking a simple question would result in some daggers being drawn.I just wondered where lots of 'friends' had gone so I could perhaps go and join them.

(and the weathers a bit on the blowie side too)
To windy for a caravan.(and the weathers a bit on the blowie side too)
JOHN . A.V. wrote:
The lad who had his motorbike in bits in the living room has goneI'm still here, and it's in the conservatrory actually, and in the shed, the garage, and a bit in the dining room......
Hello FergieLook what you've started now!!!! ;)

I think that every group - whether a forum like this, or FB group, or even my kickabout football team - has to have a critical mass to keep going. I fear we're in danger of losing that critical mass and should be trying to boost member numbers. How can we do that?
Tom
Out of interest, do you speak to your firm's clients in the same way that you express yourself on this forum?
Ray







At the end of the day nobody is forced to come here, read or post to the forum. If you don't like it then you can choose to go elsewhere.
........ actually it often feels actively hostile to new techniques and to people who are not 30 years+ experianced broadcast boys.


Nah it's a zoooooom microphone!




Many of those forums now allow the embedding of video, which I am not sure is possible here or not?
I have noticed that there are many sub forums here that are rarely active and could probably do with pruning. Perhaps make the forums more focussed. For example there is still a seperate forum for High Definition cameras from normal ...........
Memcache statistics
Operation
Bin
Key
Hit
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-variables
0
getMulti
cache
dvforums.com-cache-.wildcard-ctools_plugin_files%3A
0
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-ctools_plugin_files%3Actools%3Astyle_bases
0
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-ctools_plugin_files%3Actools%3Acontent_types
0
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-imagecache%3Apresets
0
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-imagecache%3Apresets
0
getMulti
cache
dvforums.com-cache-.wildcard-theme_registry
0
set
cache
dvforums.com-cache-theme_registry%3Asky
0
Not forgetting folks like myself who have shelf loads of family video on VHS, VHS-C, S-VHS, and Digital both 4x3 and widescreen that I keep promising to one day, edit and record onto DVD.Cheers.

I seem to have a problem with this thread I'm subscribed to. The last 20 or so notification emails I had are all From Anonymous and most time I get two of the same person. Anyone have the same problem?
I'm not so sure about the consumer, prosumer, professional approach because quite frankly, today's consumers have better products than the pros had just a few years ago.
I suspect the divider nowadays is simply format - as in sensor size and physical size - so a go pro would be in a different category to an EX3.
I seem to have a problem with this thread I'm subscribed to. The last 20 or so notification emails I had are all From Anonymous and most time I get two of the same person. Anyone have the same problem?
Hi John, thank you for your reply and link. I can now understand the post being duplicated but still don't know why it comes in my mailbox as Anonymous. It used to arrive with the name of the person who posted. See below:
Dave, please don't apologise. I wasn't too worried about multiple posts, but more about the Anonymous posts arriving. But hey, as if by magic, your post arrived in my inbox with your name.


Editing Software (FCP, Premier, etc.)
Cameras (HD, Broadcast, Web, DSLR, etc.)
On Set (Filming, Directing, etc.)
Computer Questions (Windows, Mac, Linux, Hackintosh, etc.)
Computer Hardware (Capture cards, Firewire, etc.)
Audio (Recording, Editing, etc.)


'Cameras' topic could have sub topics for example 'Sony Cameras''Panasonic Cameras'etc.These could, if it doesn't look too long winded, be sub divided into Broadcast, Web, DSLR, etc. as Martin suggested.
I'd expect people may be primarily interested in a market sector - then may wish to focus on a particular range, make or model within that.
In reality, clicking on this forum is like going to a library. You find your section and read if interesting, or you can help if there is a problem.
One can alter this forum in style but in the end of the day, its what the forum members contribute which binds us all together."
FreeFlow wrote:
"I have noticed that there are many sub forums here that are rarely active and could probably do with pruning. Perhaps make the forums more focussed. For example there is still a seperate forum for High Definition cameras from normal ........... "